I’m a bit fascinated by process. It’s true that I love to hear about other peoples and mostly that I love to feel really inside my own. I like making. I really like thinking about work. I enjoy pulling apart an idea especially if it truly makes me think about how I behave in my own life. So I am also interested in what works during develop (for me/us) and what doesn’t.
Right now we are in lot’s of development which is fun and frustrating in equal measure and there are lot’s of ideas floating around and all different ways we are pushing those ideas into action.
This is about one project that I am developing with Matt Cormack. It’s called Modern Romance.
Things I know about myself during development
I love to work in public. I write in coffee shops, I do interviews walking the streets and I want to be able to work anywhere. I’m not a big fan of an office but sometimes I miss having a little nook where I keep focused on one project
I like to talk things out. I am a deeply collaborative person and I always need more than one collaborator. I like to bounce, to re-iterate, to shift.
I like input – research, new places, new sounds, real stories from which to grow new things
I’m a bit of a “wanker”. I’m not at all flippant about work. I think making stories is really important and that every choice inside those stories matters. I believe stories are powerful and making them well is hard and so, some people would (and do) certainly think I’m truly a wanker.
I like some consistency but I detest feeling too locked into a routine.
Things I think about Matt and development
He’s a keen observer and needs time that is quiet. He likes some routine but he likes freedom too.
He loves to talk things out and needs fresh energy and conversation to remind him of key ideas
He’s funny but don’t tell him he’s writing a comedy
He’s pragmatic, not overly romantic but writes lovingly and is determined to create a great life that includes writing
He needs deadlines even though he almost never meets them.
We began developing this film, as always, with conversation. Me trying to express what those bits of inspiration that started us working. Us trying to work out why we cared about it.
We spent a week together going between my back room, our studio in the backyard and the Closer office at the Adelaide Studios. We tried to just “card” the film – write scenes onto cards and put them in order. It was quite large. I wanted to set part of the film in Krakow because I had been to a festival there (the brilliant OFF PLUS CAMERA) and had fallen a bit in love with the city. So we had our actress lead character making a film in Poland, where she fell in love with her co-star and then her partner joined her and things got…well…messy.
And matt and I started to wonder what this film was that they were making inside our film. A historical film (hence Poland) but how big was it? We began to research and we rediscovered Marie Curie (I say re-discovered because I did a project/presentation on her in year 2 or 3). The discovery that Marie was in fact Polish and finding out some of the stories about her life made us doubly inspired. What, we wondered together, would happen if we made two films, the original film idea with our actress making a film in Poland, and the film she is making, a historical film about Marie Curie? Head exploded with possibilities and excitement because for some reason we love things that push on fiction and reality, that ask you (us) to question authenticity and keep us having fresh input form the real world as we are making. This had all those things.
So we hit this point and we had carded our film and we had this idea about a particular moment in Marie Curie’s life and so Matt went and hibernated into the work and wrote a draft. And what I will say about that process is this… it wasn’t our best work. We were replicating what we saw in other people’s process and in the way that films are “usually” written. What we discovered reading that draft was that we had set out with questions that didn’t allow what we were interested in to sing, and Matt had persevered through that, trying to make the story work and the characters function within it. It was a slightly scary moment. What if we had put all this time into something that we didn’t want to make? We have had the great privilege over the last 5 or 6 years of taking everything that we have worked on (for any real length of time) into production. We didn’t like this feeling.
And so we rethought our process. What is good about us writing together? What skills do we have? Where is our combined strength?
Since that moment we have worked in a very specific way and it’s working (phew)
We switched to the Marie Curie film and we plotted the story in the simplest terms. We fleshed that out to include more about what each character wants at any one time and the purpose of each sequence. Our outline.
Now Matt writes a scene (or sequence) on his own based on our doc. He researches, thinks, finds the solution for how to do what we want them to do and creates these gorgeous scenes. He sends each one to me. I read it on my own, think it through and then we get together (in person, phone or skype) and read the scene aloud and discuss changes. In this way my gut response comes out easily and I also have a chance to see how good he is at creating scenes and fleshing out the characters in action and dialogue. It gives him room for offers and me a chance to give detailed response. He takes that and reworks the scene before we discuss the next and he moves on. It’s time consuming but wonderful and I love it.
We are doing that at home where we are close together. He comes to me at the office, in our back studio or on set if we are filming or we talk remotely, but generally we are helped along by long coffee shop talks and occasional afternoons of vodka, to keep us in the work. We are old friends and I treasure this time where we circle around from the work to our lives and back.
But Matt is about to go on an adventure to NY for three months with his lady. And so we are going to have to work remotely. And now that we have discovered this glorious system it makes me nervous. But you can’t be afraid of change right (or you can but you have to go for it anyway). So we (with the help of our producer Bec) have set up a schedule to work in. I get up at 6:30am and walk then return home for a cup of tea and to read the script he has written that day (NYC is at the end of their work day the day before, just as we wake up here in Adelaide). Then I ruminate for an hour and then we talk on skype, read the scene, give feedback and he returns to his NYC night, I have my normal work-day and repeat the next morning. I hope it works.
And how will I go with that routine? Will I settle into it because it’s creatively productive or will I want to smash it apart?
Freedom is everything, but it doesn’t always get everything done and I would like to get this done. Let’s see.